The AL East showed tight profit margins across the board. The Orioles led with solid gains, while the Yankees remained steady but not dominant. Boston and Tampa Bay produced modest returns, and Toronto barely broke even.
The Royals and Twins were the most reliable moneyline performers, both showing solid consistency. Meanwhile, Cleveland and Detroit provided moderate but positive returns, leaving the White Sox as a dramatic outlier with a deep negative swing that skewed the division’s totals.
The Astros stayed profitable and consistent, while the Mariners added strong late-season value. Oakland and Texas held near-even ground, but the Angels were the biggest drag their volatility and losses made the AL West one of the toughest divisions to trust in 2025.
The Blue Jays and Rays quietly outperformed the spread, while Boston and New York offered consistent mid-tier gains. Baltimore ’s volatility made them unpredictable, swinging between hot streaks and sharp drop-offs.
The Guardians and Tigers led the division against the spread, showing steady coverage throughout the season. Kansas City followed with moderate results, while the White Sox struggled and Minnesota ended strong despite a slow start.
The Astros and Mariners were the most dependable spread teams in the division, each closing above 50%. Texas delivered solid but uneven results, while Oakland ’s massive swings and Angels ’ poor consistency stood out as clear outliers.
The Rays and Blue Jays delivered the best Over results in the division, showing consistent offensive output. Boston offered small but steady gains, while Baltimore stayed near even. The Yankees and Toronto ’s volatility, however, made them risky Over bets with sharp swings.
The Tigers were the only AL Central team to maintain a positive Over margin, showing moderate scoring consistency. The White Sox , Royals , and Guardians hovered around breakeven, while Minnesota became a clear outlier after struggling to keep games high-scoring.
The Mariners led the division’s Over trend, followed by modest gains from Houston and Los Angeles . Texas remained inconsistent, while Oakland ’s unpredictable offense made them a low-confidence pick despite occasional bursts of value.
The Orioles led the division in Under profitability, showcasing disciplined pitching and low-scoring consistency. Tampa Bay and Boston followed with moderate returns, while Toronto ended slightly in the red. The Yankees , however, were a significant outlier with steep losses in Under plays due to high-scoring volatility.
The Royals stood out as the top Under performer in the division, capitalizing on strong defensive showings. Cleveland and Chicago maintained steady returns, while Minnesota stayed positive but modest. Detroit , on the other hand, was the lone drag unable to keep totals low consistently.
The Rangers were the most profitable Under team, benefiting from disciplined pitching and low-scoring control. Houston also showed solid Under consistency, while Seattle finished positive despite streaky totals. Los Angeles and Oakland trailed behind with limited value and uneven defensive results.
The Orioles and Yankees dominated the moneyline in 2024, consistently rewarding backers with reliable wins and strong returns. Boston and Tampa Bay produced moderate gains with balanced performances, while Toronto lagged behind, struggling to sustain momentum across the season.
The Royals emerged as the top moneyline team in the division, delivering consistent value through steady performance. Minnesota followed with impressive profits, while Cleveland and Detroit offered moderate gains. The White Sox , however, were a massive outlier sinking deep into losses that heavily skewed the division’s totals.
Houston and Seattle led the AL West in moneyline returns, each showing dependable profitability. Oakland stayed modestly positive, while Texas hovered around break-even. The Angels were the clear underperformer, plagued by volatility and costly losses that undermined the division’s overall stability.
The Rays and Blue Jays outperformed expectations against the spread, showing strong consistency and value throughout 2024. Boston maintained moderate profitability, while New York provided steady but limited returns. Baltimore ’s inconsistency made them a challenging team to back, alternating between hot streaks and sharp drop-offs.
The Guardians and Tigers led the division against the spread, maintaining steady coverage rates and solid midseason gains. Minnesota stayed modestly positive, while Kansas City hovered near even. The White Sox were again the division’s weak link, posting deep negative returns.
The Mariners and Astros remained the most dependable spread teams in 2024, rewarding bettors with consistent coverage. Texas produced solid but uneven performance, while Oakland hovered near even. The Angels , however, remained a risky play their lack of stability against the spread made them one of the division’s weakest performers.
The Orioles and Yankees led the Over category in 2024, consistently generating strong offensive results and steady profitability. Toronto also delivered positive value, while Boston stayed near breakeven. Tampa Bay , however, proved a rare outlier unable to sustain scoring momentum and finishing slightly negative overall.
Minnesota stood out as the most consistent Over team in the Central, combining balanced offense with strong reliability. Detroit and Kansas City provided modest gains, while Cleveland ’s inconsistency led to negative returns. The White Sox remained the division’s weakest performer, hampered by poor offensive support and volatile outcomes.
Oakland and Los Angeles provided solid Over returns thanks to streaky but productive offenses. Texas stayed modestly positive, while Houston struggled to generate consistent scoring. Seattle was the major outlier, producing deep losses that sharply contrasted with the division’s overall trend.
The Orioles and Yankees stood out as the most profitable Under teams in the East, driven by disciplined pitching and consistent defensive play. Toronto also posted steady gains, while Boston hovered near breakeven. Tampa Bay , however, remained an outlier — struggling to contain scoring and finishing slightly negative across most matchups.
The Royals and Twins offered the strongest Under results, each benefiting from lower-scoring matchups and disciplined pitching. Detroit followed with balanced returns, while Cleveland and the White Sox ended slightly negative, reflecting inconsistent bullpen performances.
Oakland and Los Angeles emerged as the most consistent Under performers in the West, showcasing controlled pitching and low-scoring stability. Texas also stayed modestly profitable, while Houston was unable to maintain defensive reliability. Seattle , however, was the division’s outlier — suffering sharp losses and unpredictable totals that skewed the overall results.
The Orioles dominated the 2023 moneyline landscape, producing the highest return in the division behind elite consistency and sharp closing value. Toronto and Tampa Bay followed with solid gains, while Boston delivered modest profits. The Yankees , however, were a clear outlier — their inconsistent performance and inflated lines led to deep losses despite competitive play.
Minnesota and Cleveland led the Central in profitability, each showing reliable moneyline returns throughout the season. Detroit provided moderate upside, while Kansas City remained inconsistent but occasionally rewarding. The White Sox were the division’s largest outlier, posting extreme volatility and inflated swings that skewed the overall averages.
Houston , Seattle , and Texas all delivered strong and steady moneyline value, reflecting balanced offense and pitching depth. The Angels remained inconsistent but occasionally profitable in short bursts, while Oakland was a statistical anomaly producing an extreme outlier result that distorted the division’s totals.
Tampa Bay and Toronto led the division in spread profitability, both surpassing 54% win rates while maintaining steady margin control. Baltimore and Boston were positive but moderate, showing balanced production with limited volatility. The Yankees were the clear outlier — their inconsistent spread performance and inflated lines generated extreme deviations that skewed the East’s overall average.
Detroit was the most notable performer, posting strong returns and a solid spread record near the 50% line. Minnesota followed closely with steady gains supported by disciplined play. The White Sox and Cleveland also stayed profitable, while Kansas City was the only team to post negative results, hindered by poor road performance and unreliable pitching.
Houston and Seattle were dominant spread teams in 2023, both exceeding 53% while generating consistent profit across home and away splits. Texas and the Angels stayed close to break-even, while Oakland remained a massive statistical outlier, producing inflated, unsustainable results that heavily distorted divisional averages.
The Rays were the most profitable Over team in the division, hitting at a strong 56% rate and producing the highest returns. Boston and New York each delivered modest but positive results, while Toronto stayed balanced near break-even. Baltimore was the clear outlier their offense underdelivered relative to totals, making them one of the least reliable Over plays in the league.
Kansas City and Minnesota provided the only profitable Over outcomes in the division, each showing steady late-season offensive production. The White Sox , Guardians , and Tigers all finished with negative returns, hindered by inconsistent scoring and below-average slugging percentages.
The AL West produced one of the most balanced Over markets in baseball. All five teams ended slightly positive, led by Houston and the Angels with small but steady profits. Oakland , Seattle , and Texas each maintained near-even splits throughout the year.
Toronto and New York were the most consistent Under teams in the division, each maintaining solid returns above 50%. Their strong rotations and slower offensive stretches made them reliable for total bettors. Boston and Tampa Bay were volatile, while Baltimore stood out as an outlier their aggressive offensive approach produced the sharpest deviation from the Under trend.
Cleveland and the White Sox led the division in Under profitability, both maintaining steady win rates above 50%. Detroit and Minnesota trended close to break-even, while Kansas City lagged slightly behind. The Central showed strong pitching stability overall, producing consistent low-scoring outcomes throughout the season.
The West was largely neutral on the Under side, with moderate gains across most teams. Seattle posted the best returns, reflecting elite pitching and bullpen consistency. Houston , the Angels , and Oakland delivered small but steady profits, while Texas stayed near even.
Baltimore and New York were the dominant moneyline teams in 2022, each producing strong profits and win rates above 50%. Toronto ’s consistency also yielded solid returns, while Boston hovered near break-even. Tampa Bay was steady but less explosive, showing disciplined but lower-margin results.
Cleveland was the only consistent bright spot, leading the Central with positive returns and a 56% win rate. The White Sox and Tigers both struggled to stay profitable, offsetting their occasional streaks with long losing spells. Minnesota and Kansas City trended neutral-to-negative, showing the division’s lack of overall value in 2022.
Houston completely dominated the moneyline in 2022 — an elite 65% win rate and top-tier profit margin that outpaced every other AL team. Seattle followed as a strong secondary play, maintaining over 55%. The Angels , Athletics , and Rangers all showed dramatic negative outliers, each posting outsized losses that underscored the top-heavy imbalance within the division.
Boston and Toronto were the clear standouts against the spread (ATS) in 2022, both outperforming expectations and producing sizable returns. The Yankees maintained steady profitability with a league-best 61% cover rate, while Baltimore and Tampa Bay held near-even results. Overall, the East was a bettor’s division with broad opportunity and minimal downside.
Cleveland dominated the Central with a 56.8% ATS rate and over $2,600 in returns, proving one of MLB’s most undervalued teams. Minnesota also impressed with strong late-season performance, while Kansas City quietly turned a profit despite a sub-.500 record. Detroit and Chicago showed neutral to modest gains, reflecting competitive parity in the division.
Houston once again led the West, covering over 64% of the time with consistent reliability across both home and road splits. Seattle added another profitable year with a 55% ATS rate, making them one of MLB’s most dependable teams for bettors. In contrast, the Angels , Athletics , and Rangers were significant outliers — each producing steep losses and failing to meet oddsmakers’ expectations.
The AL East leaned slightly toward balanced totals in 2022, with most teams posting modest profits on Overs. Tampa Bay and Toronto delivered the strongest returns — steady offensive consistency paired with occasional pitching volatility pushed games above totals. Boston and New York hovered just under the break-even mark, while Baltimore stood as the lone sharp negative outlier.
Detroit and Minnesota were the most profitable Over teams in the Central, both surpassing expectations with strong midseason hitting. Kansas City also trended positively, while the White Sox provided steady, midrange results. Cleveland , however, was a massive outlier — their disciplined pitching and low-scoring game style led to one of the largest negative deviations in the league.
The West offered modest Over value across the board, with Seattle and Oakland quietly outperforming expectations thanks to streaky offenses and inconsistent bullpens. The Angels showed moderate profitability, while Texas and Houston stayed near neutral. Overall, the division’s totals remained tightly aligned, reflecting its pitching-driven balance.
The East leaned slightly toward Under profitability in 2022, with most teams delivering modest gains. Baltimore , Boston , and Tampa Bay each turned small profits as totals trended lower across divisional matchups, driven by solid bullpens and reduced run production. New York was marginally negative but balanced, while Toronto was the lone severe outlier.
The Central offered a mixed Under landscape. The White Sox and Tigers both provided positive returns, benefiting from stagnant offenses and more consistent pitching than expected. Cleveland and Minnesota trended close to even, while Kansas City stood out as a large negative outlier.
Houston continued to be a steady Under performer, leading the division with a 55.9% hit rate and solid returns. Oakland and Los Angeles also added small profits as their inconsistent offenses struggled to clear lines. Seattle and Texas , meanwhile, hovered near neutral, combining streaky hitting with unpredictable bullpens. Overall, the West leaned slightly Under, mirroring its pitching-heavy identity throughout 2022.
The AL East delivered elite profitability at the top in 2021, highlighted by the Red Sox , Yankees , and Blue Jays all finishing above a 56% win rate and generating over $1,200 returns each. The Rays , while slightly lower in earnings, maintained an impressive 61% win rate, showcasing the division’s overall strength and balance.
The White Sox were the cornerstone of Central profitability, posting a 57% win rate and over $1,700 in returns. The Tigers and Twins provided modest but steady gains, while Cleveland hovered near even. Kansas City underperformed slightly, rounding out a division defined by stability more than dominance.
The Astros led the West both on-field and in profitability, boasting a 59% win rate and over $2,000 in profits. The Athletics and Mariners also provided steady value with balanced play, while the Angels managed mid-tier results. Texas was the lone weak link, finishing deep in the red.
The AL East showed tight profit margins across the board. The Rays led with steady, reliable gains, while Boston and Toronto both delivered solid value for bettors. The Yankees held consistent ground with modest returns, and Baltimore was the clear outlier, generating heavy losses that skewed the division’s overall balance.
The AL Central produced mixed but notable results. The White Sox anchored the division with dependable spread performance, while the Tigers and Twins each turned quiet but positive returns. Cleveland and Kansas City stood out as statistical outliers their inflated figures reflected volatility more than true consistency.
The AL West delivered steady midrange profits overall. The Athletics topped the group with consistent covers, while the Astros , Mariners , and Angels stayed closely aligned in performance. Texas was the lone collapse, underperforming drastically and erasing value with one of the league’s weakest cover rates.
The AL East showed controlled, mid-level returns across most teams. The Rays produced the strongest Over results, while Baltimore and the Yankees provided balanced but limited profits. Boston stayed slightly below the line with conservative outcomes, and Toronto hovered near neutral, signaling a tightly priced division.
The AL Central offered mixed returns for Over bettors. Cleveland led with steady gains, while Minnesota quietly added modest profits. The White Sox maintained mid-tier consistency, and Detroit struggled offensively, dragging overall returns. Kansas City remained volatile, keeping totals unpredictable week to week.
The AL West delivered balanced results across the board. The Angels and Astros led with dependable Over trends, each generating over $1,000 in profit. The Mariners and Rangers followed close behind, both finishing slightly positive. Oakland lagged modestly, with totals leaning Under for much of the season.
The AL East leaned slightly toward the Under, though overall profits stayed modest. The Yankees led with solid returns, while Toronto and Boston also provided consistent value. Tampa Bay hovered near even, and Baltimore was the lone negative performer, finishing just below break-even.
The AL Central showed balanced Under performance across most teams. Detroit posted the best returns with over $900 in profit, followed closely by Cleveland and the White Sox . Kansas City held near even, while Minnesota slipped into minor losses, marking one of the few negative totals in the division.
The AL West reflected mixed outcomes. The Angels , Athletics , and Rangers each produced moderate profits, while Houston barely cleared positive ground. Seattle stood out as the lone underperformer, suffering significant losses despite competitive play otherwise. Overall, Unders leaned profitable but inconsistent across the division.
